Digital Methods

Bibliography Menu
Sorted by: Author | Title | Date | Recently Added

General topics: Capitalism | Development (and Alternative development) | Diversity | Globalization | Neoliberalism (➦ Corporatization of the university) | Social justice
Note: The above are some topics that research activists tend to discuss as general concepts related to causes. But these general topics do not cover all specific causes and issues actually addressed (for which see below).
Specific causes & issues: Ageism | AI Bias | AIDS | Antiracism (see also Racism) | Antiwar | Apartheid | Caste antidiscrimination | Censorship | Childcare | Class discrimination | Decolonization | Digital justice | Disability rights | Drugs | Education reform (➦ In HigherEd) | Economic Inequality | Environment (➦ Biodiversity ➦ Climate change ➦ Environmental justice) | Feminist activism | Food justice (➦ Food sovereignty | Slow food) | Freedom of speech | Gender equality (➦ Reproductive labor [See also Womens rights]) | Health care reform (➦ Health advocacy) | Heteronormativity (➦ Toxic masculinity) | Housing & zoning issues (➦ Gentrification ➦ Houselessness (including homelessness) ➦ Housing reform ➦ Skidrow) | Human rights | Indigenous rights | Information access | Infrastructure | Labor activism (➦ Adjunct instructors | Anti-work | Care work | Domestic work | Feminized labor | Reproductive labor | Sex work | Unionization) | Land politics | Language activism (➦ Linguistic discrimination | Linguistic diversity) | Legal system (➦ Criminal justice system ➦ Police reform ➦ Prison abolition) | Medical system reform | Mental health | Microaggressions | Population movement (➦ Forced displacement ★ Migration ➦ Immigration ★ Immigration activism ★ Undocumented residents rights) | Prison change (➦ Prison abolition ➦ Prison reform) | Racism (see also Antiracism) | Reproductive justice (➦ Abortion | Reproductive labor) | Right-wing activism | Surveillance | Trade treaties | Water justice | Women's rights (➦ Feminicide ➦ Violence against women)

General topics: [TBD]
Age & generation groups: Children | Youth | Elderly | Generations (➦ [TBD])
Citizenship, residency, migrant groups: Citizens | Immigrants | Migrants | Refugees | Undocumented residents
Gender groups: LGBTQ | Men | Women
Economic groups: [TBD]
Professional & Occupational groups: (See also in this menu under "In Disciplines & Professions" > "Professions") Knowledge workers | Professionals | Veterans
Religious groups: [TBD]

Issues in LowerEd Research Activism: Discipline | Preservice teaching | Teaching | Curriculum (re)design
LowerEd Personnel & Research/Activism: Administration | Students

General topics: [TBD]
Arts (Creative & Performing Arts): Architecture | Art (➦ Digital arts ➦ Street art ➦ Textile art) | Music (➦ Ethnomusicology) | Performance studies | Theater
Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics (STEM): AI (artificial intelligence) | Computer science | Data science | Engineering (➦ In Silicon Valley) | Environmental sciences
"None, or All of the Above": Organic intellectuals | Public intellectuals

Simple Search (on this website)

Search for text strings that appear in authors and titles (sorted by author) (no abstracts.) Arrow curved down
Search by:
thinking

Advanced Search (on Zotero site)

Explanation: The content of the Research + Activism Bibliography is kept as a group library in the Zotero bibliography manager, and then pulled into this WordPress site through the ZotPress plug-in. Showing the bibliography on our WordPress site allows us to organize and narrate tagged categories to create what amounts to a conceptual map. But search capabilities are simpler. More advanced searching is available through direct online access to our Zotero bibliogaphy (but Zotero's own interface does not allow us to organize and narrate our tags).
For more advanced and granular search by author, title, year, and tag (with abstracts available), use the online interface of the Zotero group library holding our content. Click on "Go to Arrow to right, black Zotero"
Online inferface of Zotero library underlying the Research + Activism Bibliograpy.
Online inferface of Zotero library underlying the Research + Activism Bibliograpy.

by Date by Author

 

See also Data Science, Digital Humanities, New Media Studies, and Social Media Analysis.

 

Amaro, Ramon. The Black Technical Object: On Machine Learning and the Aspiration of Black Being. Sternberg Press / The Antipolitical. Cambridge, MA, USA: Sternberg Press, 2023. Cite
Klassen, Shamika, and Casey Fiesler. “‘This Isn’t Your Data, Friend’: Black Twitter as a Case Study on Research Ethics for Public Data.” Social Media + Society 8, no. 4 (2022): 205630512211443. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221144317. Cite
Silva, Rafael M. L., Erica Principe Cruz, Daniela K. Rosner, Dayton Kelly, Andrés Monroy-Hernández, and Fannie Liu. “Understanding AR Activism: An Interview Study with Creators of Augmented Reality Experiences for Social Change.” In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–15. New Orleans, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517605. Cite
Black in AI. “Home Page,” 2022. https://blackinai.github.io/#/. Cite
Day, Faithe J. “From Recording Black Death to Celebrating Living Data: Creativity, COVID 19, and Community Care.” Visualizing the Virus (blog), 2021. https://visualizingthevirus.com/entry/from-recording-black-death-to-celebrating-living-data/. Cite
LXAI. “Home Page.” LXAI, 2021. https://www.latinxinai.org. Cite
Deep Learning Indaba. “Home Page,” 2021. https://deeplearningindaba.com/2021/. Cite
Day, Faithe J. Black Living Data Booklet. fjday.com, 2021. https://hcommons.org/deposits/item/hc:44177/. Cite
Montoya, Sarah. “Alive with Story: Mapping Indigenous Los Angeles and Carrying Our Ancestors Home.” In Digital Mapping and Indigenous America, 9–16. New York, NY: Routledge, 2021. Cite
“AI:CULT - Culturally Aware AI,” 2021. https://www.cultural-ai.nl/projects/aicult-culturally-aware-ai. Cite
Hess, Janet Berry, ed. Digital Mapping and Indigenous America. New York, NY: Routledge, 2021. Cite
DAIR (Distributed AI Research Institute). “Home Page,” 2021. https://www.dair-institute.org/. Cite
Risam, Roopika, and Kelly Baker Josephs, eds. The Digital Black Atlantic. Manifold. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2021. https://dhdebates.gc.cuny.edu/projects/the-digital-black-atlantic. Cite
Media Activism Research Collective (MARC). “Home Page.” Center on Digital Culture and Society, Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, 2021. https://www.asc.upenn.edu/research/centers/center-digital-culture-and-society/people/media-activism-research-collective. Cite
Denton, Emily, Mark Díaz, Ian Kivlichan, Vinodkumar Prabhakaran, and Rachel Rosen. “Whose Ground Truth? Accounting for Individual and Collective Identities Underlying Dataset Annotation.” ArXiv:2112.04554 [Cs], 2021. http://arxiv.org/abs/2112.04554. Cite
Christian, Aymar Jean, Faithe Day, Mark Díaz, and Chelsea Peterson-Salahuddin. “Platforming Intersectionality: Networked Solidarity and the Limits of Corporate Social Media.” Social Media + Society 6, no. 3 (2020): 205630512093330. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120933301. Cite
Moore, Erik A., Valerie M. Collins, and Lisa R. Johnston. “Institutional Repositories for Public Engagement: Creating a Common Good Model for an Engaged Campus.” Journal of Library Outreach and Engagement 1, no. 1 (2020): 116–29. https://doi.org/10.21900/j.jloe.v1i1.472. Cite
So, Richard Jean, and Edwin Roland. “Race and Distant Reading.” PMLA 135, no. 1 (2020): 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1632/pmla.2020.135.1.59. Cite
Rambsy, Howard. “African American Scholars and the Margins of DH.” PMLA 135, no. 1 (2020): 152–58. https://doi.org/10.1632/pmla.2020.135.1.152. Cite
Williams, Sherri. “The Black Digital Syllabus Movement: The Fusion of Academia, Activism and Arts.” Howard Journal of Communications 31, no. 5 (2020): 493–508. https://doi.org/10.1080/10646175.2020.1743393. Cite
Reilly, Paul. “Curation, Connections and Creativity: Reflections on Using Twitter to Teach Digital Activism,” 2020. https://doi.org/10.24377/LJMU.jsml.vol1article356. Cite
Eschmann, Rob, Jacob Groshek, Rachel Chanderdatt, Khea Chang, and Maysa Whyte. “Making a Microaggression: Using Big Data and Qualitative Analysis to Map the Reproduction and Disruption of Microaggressions through Social Media.” Social Media + Society 6, no. 4 (2020): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120975716. Cite
Pillay, Suntosh R. “The Revolution Will Not Be Peer Reviewed: (Creative) Tensions between Academia, Social Media and Anti-Racist Activism.” South African Journal of Psychology 50, no. 3 (2020): 308–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/0081246320948369. Cite
Young, Jason C. “Rural Digital Geographies and New Landscapes of Social Resilience.” Journal of Rural Studies 70 (2019): 66–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.07.001. Cite
Hannah-Jones, Nikole. “America Wasn’t a Democracy, Until Black Americans Made It One.” The New York Times Magazine, 2019. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/08/14/magazine/black-history-american-democracy.html, https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/08/14/magazine/black-history-american-democracy.html. Cite
Hannah-Jones, Nikole, Tiya Miles, Desmond, Matthew, Baradaran, Mehrsa, Interlandi, Jeneen, Kruse, Kevin M., Bouie, Jamelle, et al. “The 1619 Project.” The New York Times Magazine, 2019. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/08/14/magazine/1619-america-slavery.html, https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/08/14/magazine/1619-america-slavery.html. Cite
Evans, Jeff, and Ludi Simpson. “The Radical Statistics Group: Using Statistics for Progressive Social Change.” Data in Society: Challenging Statistics in an Age of Globalisation Data in Society: Challenging Statistics in an Age of Globalisation, 2019, 307–18. https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781447348214.003.0024. Cite
Gray, Jonathan, and Liliana Bounegru. “What a Difference a Dataset Makes? Data Journalism and/as Data Activism.” In Data in Society: Challenging Statistics in an Age of Globalisation Data in Society: Challenging Statistics in an Age of Globalisation, 365–74. Bristol: Policy Press, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781447348214.003.0030. Cite
Evans, Jeff, Sally Ruane, and Humphrey Southall, eds. Data in Society: Challenging Statistics in an Age of Globalisation. Bristol: Policy Press, 2019. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvmd84wn. Cite
So, Richard Jean, Hoyt Long, and Yuancheng Zhu. “Race, Writing, and Computation: Racial Difference and the US Novel, 1880-2000.” Journal of Cultural Analytics, 2019. https://culturalanalytics.org/article/11057-race-writing-and-computation-racial-difference-and-the-us-novel-1880-2000. Cite
Benjamin, Ruha. Race after Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code. Medford, MA: Polity, 2019. Cite
Guiliano, Jennifer, and Carolyn Heitman. “Difficult Heritage and the Complexities of Indigenous Data.” Journal of Cultural Analytics, 2019, 1041. https://culturalanalytics.org/article/11041-difficult-heritage-and-the-complexities-of-indigenous-data. Cite
Braidotti, Rosi, and Maria Hlavajova, eds. Posthuman Glossary. 1st ed. Theory. London: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc, 2018. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350030275. Cite
Johnson, Jessica Marie. “Markup Bodies: Black [Life] Studies and Slavery [Death] Studies at the Digital Crossroads.” Social Text 36, no. 4 (137) (2018): 57–79. https://doi.org/10.1215/01642472-7145658. Cite
Mahabir, Ron, Arie Croitoru, Andrew Crooks, Peggy Agouris, and Anthony Stefanidis. “News Coverage, Digital Activism, and Geographical Saliency: A Case Study of Refugee Camps and Volunteered Geographical Information.” PLOS ONE 13, no. 11 (2018): e0206825. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206825. Cite
Conley, Tara L. “Decoding Black Feminist Hashtags as Becoming.” The Black Scholar 47, no. 3 (2017): 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/00064246.2017.1330107. Cite
Johnson, Jessica Marie, and Mark Anthony Neal. “Introduction: Wild Seed in the Machine.” The Black Scholar 47, no. 3 (2017): 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1080/00064246.2017.1329608. Cite
Ince, Jelani, Fabio Rojas, and Clayton A. Davis. “The Social Media Response to Black Lives Matter: How Twitter Users Interact with Black Lives Matter through Hashtag Use.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 40, no. 11 (2017): 1814–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2017.1334931. Cite
McGlotten, Shaka. “Black Data.” In No Tea, No Shade, edited by E. Patrick Johnson, 262–86. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822373711-014. Cite
Risam, Roopika. “Navigating the Global Digital Humanities: Insights from Black Feminism.” In Debates in the Digital Humanities, Manifold., 359–67. Debates in the Digital Humanities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2016. https://dhdebates.gc.cuny.edu/read/untitled/section/4316ff92-bad0-45e8-8f09-90f493c6f564#ch29. Cite
Gallon, Kim. “Making a Case for the Black Digital Humanities.” In Debates in the Digital Humanities 2016, 2016:42–49. Debates in the Digital Humanities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2016. https://dhdebates.gc.cuny.edu/read/untitled/section/fa10e2e1-0c3d-4519-a958-d823aac989eb#ch04. Cite
Risam, Roopika. “Diasporizing the Digital Humanities: Displacing the Center and Periphery.” International Journal of E-Politics 7, no. 3 (2016): 65–78. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEP.2016070105. Cite
Schweitzer, Ivy. “Native Sovereignty and the Archive: Samson Occom and Digital Humanities.” Resources for American Literary Study 38 (2015): 21–52. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26367559. Cite
Risam, Roopika. “South Asian Digital Humanities: An Overview.” South Asian Review 36, no. 3 (2015): 161–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/02759527.2015.11933040. Cite
Noble, Safiya Umoja, and Brendesha M. Tynes, eds. The Intersectional Internet: Race, Sex, Class and Culture Online. Digital Formations, vol. 105. New York: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc, 2015. Cite
Rambukanna, Nathan. “FCJ-194 From #RaceFail to #Ferguson: The Digital Intimacies of Race-Activist Hashtag Publics.” Fibreculture Journal, no. 26 (2015): 160–89. https://doi.org/10.15307/fcj.26.194.2015. Cite
Kim, David J. “Archives, Models, and Methods for Critical Approaches to Identities: Representing Race and Ethnicity in the Digital Humanities.” UCLA, 2015. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9gj619sd. Cite
Vergés Bosch, Núria, Alex Hache, and Eva Cruells Lopez. “Ciberfeminismo de investigacción con y entre tecnoartistas y hackers. / Cyberfeminist Activist Research With and Among Technoartists and Hackers.” Athenea Digital. Revista de pensamiento e investigación social 14, no. 4 (2014): 153–80. https://www.academia.edu/10072876/Ciberfeminismo_de_investigacci%C3%B3n_con_y_entre_tecnoartistas_y_hackers. Cite
Galina Russell, Isabel. “Geographical and Linguistic Diversity in the Digital Humanities.” Literary and Linguistic Computing 29, no. 3 (2014): 307–16. https://academic.oup.com/dsh/article/29/3/307/986270. Cite
Dahdal, Sohail. “Digital Media Arts as Terrain for Inter-Cultural Political Activism.” Thesis, University of Technology, Sydney, 2014. https://opus.lib.uts.edu.au/handle/10453/29225. Cite