Digital Humanities

Bibliography Menu
Sorted by: Author | Title | Date | Recently Added




General topics: Capitalism | Development (and Alternative development) | Diversity | Globalization | Neoliberalism (➦ Corporatization of the university) | Social justice
Note: The above are some topics that research activists tend to discuss as general concepts related to causes. But these general topics do not cover all specific causes and issues actually addressed (for which see below).

Specific causes & issues: Ageism | AI Bias | AIDS | Antiracism (see also Racism) | Antiwar | Apartheid | Caste antidiscrimination | Censorship | Childcare | Class discrimination | Decolonization | Digital justice | Disability rights | Drugs | Education reform (➦ In HigherEd) | Economic Inequality | Environment (➦ BiodiversityClimate changeEnvironmental justice) | Feminist activism | Food justice (➦ Food sovereignty | Slow food) | Freedom of speech | Gender equality (➦ Reproductive labor [See also Womens rights]) | Health care reform (➦ Health advocacy) | Heteronormativity (➦ Toxic masculinity) | Housing & zoning issues (➦ GentrificationHouselessness (including homelessness)Housing reformSkidrow) | Human rights | Indigenous rights | Information access | Infrastructure | Labor activism (➦ Adjunct instructors | Anti-work | Care work | Domestic work | Feminized labor | Reproductive labor | Sex work | Unionization) | Land politics | Language activism (➦ Linguistic discrimination | Linguistic diversity) | Legal system (➦ Criminal justice systemPolice reformPrison abolition) | Medical system reform | Mental health | Microaggressions | Population movement (➦ Forced displacementMigrationImmigrationImmigration activismUndocumented residents rights) | Prison change (➦ Prison abolitionPrison reform) | Racism (see also Antiracism) | Reproductive justice (➦ Abortion | Reproductive labor) | Right-wing activism | Surveillance | Trade treaties | Water justice | Women's rights (➦ FeminicideViolence against women)

General topics: [TBD]

Age & generation groups: Children | Youth | Elderly | Generations (➦ [TBD])

Citizenship, residency, migrant groups: Citizens | Immigrants | Migrants | Refugees | Undocumented residents

Gender groups: LGBTQ | Men | Women

Economic groups: [TBD]

Professional & Occupational groups: (See also in this menu under "In Disciplines & Professions" > "Professions") Knowledge workers | Professionals | Veterans


Religious groups: [TBD]

Issues in LowerEd Research Activism: Discipline | Preservice teaching | Teaching | Curriculum (re)design

LowerEd Personnel & Research/Activism: Administration | Students

General topics: [TBD]

Arts (Creative & Performing Arts): Architecture | Art (➦ Digital artsStreet artTextile art) | Music (➦ Ethnomusicology) | Performance studies | Theater



Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics (STEM): AI (artificial intelligence) | Computer science | Data science | Engineering (➦ In Silicon Valley) | Environmental sciences





"None, or All of the Above": Organic intellectuals | Public intellectuals

Simple Search (on this website)

Search for text strings that appear in authors and titles (sorted by author) (no abstracts.) Arrow curved down
thinking

Advanced Search (on Zotero site)

Explanation: The content of the Research + Activism Bibliography is kept as a group library in the Zotero bibliography manager, and then pulled into this WordPress site through the ZotPress plug-in. Showing the bibliography on our WordPress site allows us to organize and narrate tagged categories to create what amounts to a conceptual map. But search capabilities are simpler. More advanced searching is available through direct online access to our Zotero bibliogaphy (but Zotero's own interface does not allow us to organize and narrate our tags).
For more advanced and granular search by author, title, year, and tag (with abstracts available), use the online interface of the Zotero group library holding our content. Click on "Go to Arrow to right, black Zotero"
Online inferface of Zotero library underlying the Research + Activism Bibliograpy.
Online inferface of Zotero library underlying the Research + Activism Bibliograpy.

by Date by Author

 

 

Amaro, Ramon. The Black Technical Object: On Machine Learning and the Aspiration of Black Being. Sternberg Press / The Antipolitical. Cambridge, MA, USA: Sternberg Press, 2023. Cite
Day, Faithe J. “From Recording Black Death to Celebrating Living Data: Creativity, COVID 19, and Community Care.” Visualizing the Virus (blog), 2021. https://visualizingthevirus.com/entry/from-recording-black-death-to-celebrating-living-data/. Cite
Day, Faithe J. Black Living Data Booklet. fjday.com, 2021. https://hcommons.org/deposits/item/hc:44177/. Cite
Montoya, Sarah. “Alive with Story: Mapping Indigenous Los Angeles and Carrying Our Ancestors Home.” In Digital Mapping and Indigenous America, 9–16. New York, NY: Routledge, 2021. Cite
Hess, Janet Berry, ed. Digital Mapping and Indigenous America. New York, NY: Routledge, 2021. Cite
Risam, Roopika, and Kelly Baker Josephs, eds. The Digital Black Atlantic. Manifold. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2021. https://dhdebates.gc.cuny.edu/projects/the-digital-black-atlantic. Cite
Williams, Sherri. “The Black Digital Syllabus Movement: The Fusion of Academia, Activism and Arts.” The Howard Journal of Communications 31, no. 5 (2020): 493–508. https://doi.org/10.1080/10646175.2020.1743393. Cite
Christian, Aymar Jean, Faithe Day, Mark Díaz, and Chelsea Peterson-Salahuddin. “Platforming Intersectionality: Networked Solidarity and the Limits of Corporate Social Media.” Social Media + Society 6, no. 3 (2020): 205630512093330. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120933301. Cite
So, Richard Jean, and Edwin Roland. “Race and Distant Reading.” PMLA 135, no. 1 (2020): 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1632/pmla.2020.135.1.59. Cite
Rambsy, Howard. “African American Scholars and the Margins of DH.” PMLA 135, no. 1 (2020): 152–58. https://doi.org/10.1632/pmla.2020.135.1.152. Cite
Klein, Lauren F. “Dimensions of Scale: Invisible Labor, Editorial Work, and the Future of Quantitative Literary Studies.” PMLA 135, no. 1 (2020): 23–39. https://doi.org/10.1632/pmla.2020.135.1.23. Cite
So, Richard Jean, Hoyt Long, and Yuancheng Zhu. “Race, Writing, and Computation: Racial Difference and the US Novel, 1880-2000.” Journal of Cultural Analytics, 2019. https://culturalanalytics.org/article/11057-race-writing-and-computation-racial-difference-and-the-us-novel-1880-2000. Cite
Ward, Megan, and Adrian S Wisnicki. “The Archive After Theory.” In Debates in the Digital Humanities 2019. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2019. https://dhdebates.gc.cuny.edu/read/untitled-f2acf72c-a469-49d8-be35-67f9ac1e3a60/section/a8eccb81-e950-4760-ba93-38e0b1f2b9d0#ch18. Cite
Guiliano, Jennifer, and Carolyn Heitman. “Difficult Heritage and the Complexities of Indigenous Data.” Journal of Cultural Analytics, 2019, 1041. https://culturalanalytics.org/article/11041-difficult-heritage-and-the-complexities-of-indigenous-data. Cite
Johnson, Jessica Marie. “Markup Bodies: Black [Life] Studies and Slavery [Death] Studies at the Digital Crossroads.” Social Text 36, no. 4 (137) (2018): 57–79. https://doi.org/10.1215/01642472-7145658. Cite
Johnson, Jessica Marie, and Mark Anthony Neal. “Introduction: Wild Seed in the Machine.” The Black Scholar 47, no. 3 (2017): 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1080/00064246.2017.1329608. Cite
Risam, Roopika. “Navigating the Global Digital Humanities: Insights from Black Feminism.” In Debates in the Digital Humanities, Manifold., 359–67. Debates in the Digital Humanities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2016. https://dhdebates.gc.cuny.edu/read/untitled/section/4316ff92-bad0-45e8-8f09-90f493c6f564#ch29. Cite
Gallon, Kim. “Making a Case for the Black Digital Humanities.” In Debates in the Digital Humanities 2016, 2016:42–49. Debates in the Digital Humanities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2016. https://dhdebates.gc.cuny.edu/read/untitled/section/fa10e2e1-0c3d-4519-a958-d823aac989eb#ch04. Cite
Risam, Roopika. “Diasporizing the Digital Humanities: Displacing the Center and Periphery.” International Journal of E-Politics 7, no. 3 (2016): 65–78. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEP.2016070105. Cite
Schweitzer, Ivy. “Native Sovereignty and the Archive: Samson Occom and Digital Humanities.” Resources for American Literary Study 38 (2015): 21–52. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26367559. Cite
Risam, Roopika. “South Asian Digital Humanities: An Overview.” South Asian Review 36, no. 3 (2015): 161–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/02759527.2015.11933040. Cite
Kim, David J. “Archives, Models, and Methods for Critical Approaches to Identities: Representing Race and Ethnicity in the Digital Humanities.” UCLA, 2015. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9gj619sd. Cite
Galina Russell, Isabel. “Geographical and Linguistic Diversity in the Digital Humanities.” Literary and Linguistic Computing 29, no. 3 (2014): 307–16. https://academic.oup.com/dsh/article/29/3/307/986270. Cite
Terman, Rochelle. “Black Studies and Digital Humanities: Perils and Promise.” Townsend Center for the Humanities, 2012. https://townsendcenter.berkeley.edu/blog/black-studies-and-digital-humanities-perils-and-promise. Cite
Mcpherson, Tara. “Why Are the Digital Humanities So White? Or Thinking the Histories of Race and Computation.” In Debates in the Digital Humanities 2012, 139–60. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2012. https://dhdebates.gc.cuny.edu/read/untitled-88c11800-9446-469b-a3be-3fdb36bfbd1e/section/20df8acd-9ab9-4f35-8a5d-e91aa5f4a0ea. Cite
Liu, Alan. “Where Is Cultural Criticism in the Digital Humanities?” Debates in the Digital Humanities, 2012. https://dhdebates.gc.cuny.edu/read/untitled-88c11800-9446-469b-a3be-3fdb36bfbd1e/section/896742e7-5218-42c5-89b0-0c3c75682a2f#ch29. Cite
Earhart, Amy E. “Can Information Be Unfettered? Race and the New Digital Humanities Canon.” In Debates in the Digital Humanities, Manifold., 309–18. Debates in the Digital Humanities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2011. https://dhdebates.gc.cuny.edu/read/untitled-88c11800-9446-469b-a3be-3fdb36bfbd1e/section/cf0af04d-73e3-4738-98d9-74c1ae3534e5#ch18. Cite
Alkalimat, Abdul. “EBlack Studies: A Twenty-First-Century Challenge.” Souls, no. Summer (2000). http://www.alkalimat.org/319%20alkalimat%202000%20eBlack%20studies%20A%20twenty%20first%20century%20challenge%20-%20in%20Souls.pdf. Cite